Working title is one of the biggest names in film. It makes sense that they would market their films adapted to what people want to see on their screens, this is a clever way of bringing in a large amount of money as the film is in demand.
Working Title markets films differently to the US then it would to the UK. America stereo typically likes British Rom-Com films. They are something the US has yet to master. For example the trailer for 'Four Weddings and a Funeral' is different to the one shown in the UK. The one for the US may have had actors in it that they might have not heard of. However the last image on the US trailer is of Rowan Atkinson, this implies he is a big name in America and someone they enjoy watching.
The films they target the US with, would have award winning directors, a-list actors, sometimes they are based on a best selling novel, much like 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy' and it would be a popular genre that would do particularly well. Often the locations play a big role in films being so successful, American audiences really take to films like 'Hot Fuzz' because it is filmed in the British Countryside with British A-List actors. Also the films must have a strong target audience, however for a film like 'Four Weddings and a Funeral' it appeals to a pretty wide range of people.
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy has been marketed very cleverly, it targets the older audience, possibly middle aged, or people who are interested in the Cold-War and spies etc. I went to see it and I don't think it was appropriate for my age group (16-17) It was difficult to follow and very complicated. Working Title spent $30,000,000 on creating the film and marketing it to it's appropriate target audience. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy has an award winning director, Tomas Alfredson. The A-List actors, Colin Firth, Gary Oldman, Mark Strong etc. It is also based on a bestselling book 'Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy'. The film also have fantastic screenplay. Part of it was filmed in Hungary so the attraction of different locations was there. Seeing as though Working Title was founded by Brits, it was very important that they made a film with many British actors in it. So Colin Firth and Mark Strong etc must have been very important. To promote this film, they didn't really create a synergy, more of a symbosis, different companies working together to promote the same product. Vivendi Universal owns Vue and Odeon cinemas which are the main multiplexes in Britain , they dominate the film consumption industry in Britain so they control how much of one film is promoted etc.Vivendi has horizontal and vertical integration.
Even though the trends in the film industry are constantly and rapidly changing, Working Title will continue to produce timeless films. For example, people still watch films produced in 1994, 'Four Weddings and a Funeral'. Working Title will advertise films differently to individual countries, as said earlier, the film trailer was cut differently for the US market to how it is marketed to the UK audience. Working Title has shaped and created trends for film producers to follow, I think they can continue being an individual British Film company.
You have made many important points in this essay Emily - strength is the independent research you have done into the ways in which films are packaged and marketed for US audience.
ReplyDeleteYou needed to anchor the essay in Working Title history/development. ie: The way in which WT packaged films for US market after it was bought by Universal. Then you needed to look at Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy as a move away from Universal and as a film packaged and marketed for European market. Relate this new direction to way in which film industry has polarised - massive budget broad appeal films for cinema audiences - and smaller budget films for niche audiences.